The Engaging With Vietnam story begins in the late 1990s when its founder, Phan Le Ha, went to Monash University in Australia to pursue post-graduate studies. Confident in her knowledge about Vietnam, Le Ha found to her surprise in interacting with professors and students in Australia that some of the “truths” that she believed in could be seen from other perspectives. At the same time, she also recognized that some of the “facts” that scholars outside of Vietnam felt they understood about her homeland were problematic, and with the many changes taking place in Vietnam at that time, were in some cases outdated as well.
As she looked around at fellow post-graduate students in Australia, Le Ha also saw that there was a growing number of people who were like her, a new generation of globalizing Vietnamese who had come of age in a new Vietnam and who were now trying to navigate their way through various established bodies of knowledge.
It is in this context that Le Ha came up with the idea for the Engaging With Vietnam: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue initiative.
To put it simply, Le Ha came to realize that none of us can really understand Vietnam (or any other place) if we do not look carefully and critically at knowledge production. If we do not think critically about what we think about Vietnam and why we think that way, then we cannot really be confident in our knowledge.
She, therefore, came up with the idea of creating a “dialogue” that would enable scholars to discern how certain types of knowledge about Vietnam were influenced by the contexts in which they were developed, and to benefit from the insights of colleagues, particularly those in other disciplines, who produce knowledge from different contexts and perspectives than one’s own.
So in 2009, now as Dr. Phan Le Ha in the Faculty of Education at Monash University, Le Ha proposed to Professor Stephanie Fahey, the then Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Global Engagement) at Monash University, the idea of establishing an annual conference that would address the issue of knowledge production.
Stephanie said “Yes!”, and the rest is history. . .